Also seating bullets deeper can increase pressures. If your rifle has a tight neck, or a shorter chamber ( Rugers are generous) then work up your loads. Work up if the higher loads near max are to be used in hot weather.īullets were seated out to the magazine length in the Ruger. These loads were tested in cool weather, moist outside and around the 55 to 60 degree ranges. Game bullets would have the punch to drop a coyote at those velocities. Even at 2000 fps or under, these would make good loads for calling coyotes if you can bring them in at 100 yds or so. Consult a trajectory chart in some of the commercially available reload manuals. At the lower volumes, such as 7 grains and up, these can also make a very satisfactory load for Squirrel hunting, or similar sized game at appropriate ranges.
#SUBSONIC 223 RECIPES 90 GRAIN PLUS#
My own 22 mags are going to get dusty, as these loads are not only cheaper to shoot, but are more accurate… plus one can have a bullet of his choice instead of what the factory picks to load. The recoil is very low, but also so is the noise at these levels. The 22/250 can be loaded down to levels that are between a 22 Long Rifle and a 22 Mag. Let them learn with experience and practice to learn to shoot at longer ranges. I also feel that training a youth not to take shots over that distance is a responsible habit for an adult to teach younger shooters. As one can see, the increase in fps is not that much, and would make no real world difference, as I consider that 200 yds would be max range. Start looking for max with 18 grains or so. Results for a 64 grain Winchester would be close to the same, just recommend working up. The 223 has the economy of cheaper brass, but the 22/250 I thought offered more flexibility by being able to achieve higher velocities with heavier bullets than the 223 achieves.įor training of youths to deer hunt, the 63 grain bullet offered a lot of promise of everything tested. 20 grs: 2982 fps ( Popped primer, jammed bolt)įor training and starting out a youth, I consider the 22/250 a better first choice to start out with, based on the test results as compared to a 223. 19 grs: 2958 fps ( Consider Maximum!, NO problems observed)ġ4. Sierra 63 grain Semi Pointed ( SMP) Win Mag Rifle Primerġ3. I am just reporting damage to media, and penetration that I am passing on to the reader. Key is shot placement and range limitation. Some argue against 22 Center fire on deer and others are just fine with it. Use on deer is the personal choice of the shooter or adult. The 63 grain Sierra SMP showed a lot more damage to the tree than did the Hornady, and at a much lower velocity. Based on this I would recommend this point as a potential deer load for youths, keeping range within 100 to 125 yds or so ( 30/30 range). Recommend Max load at 19 grains or less.īased on tree used as back stop, which had a 6 inch diameter to it, bullets at 15 grains of powder and up were penetrating the tree completely. 20 grs: 3119 fps ( primer leaked, extractor marks, scrapped case) Hornady 60 grain SP, Win Mag Rifle Primerġ4. However once again I recommend max capacity at 19 grains or less. IV Winchester 55 gr FMJ, Win Large Pistol PrimerĪs again Noted, this bullet also achieved reaching the 20 grain Mark ( 60%). However once again I recommend max being set at 19 grains or less. This bullet also reached the 20 grains mark ( 60 %). III Sierra 52 grain Hollow Point Match Win Large Pistol Primer However, I would recommend max being set at 19 grains or less. With this bullet, all the way to 20 grains was reached ( 60%). 50 grain Hornady SP, Win Large Rifle Primer 20 grs: 3440 fps ( Extractor Mark, Scrapped Case) 46 grain Winchester Hollow Point, Win Large Pistol Primerġ4. 20 % ( 6.6 grains) 60 % ( 19.8 grains)Ĥ6 Win HP, 50 Hornady SP, 52 Sierra HP Match, 55 Win FMJ, 60 Hornady SP That notwithstanding.here is some data you may find useful. it adds to the rifle versatility with reduced loads.these loads are results I have tested, but ultimately the safety of such loads are the responsibility of the handloader himself as he is the only one that has control over his use of ANY data and the safety precautions of his handloading techniques. Well, I don't agree with those above that the 22.250 can't do reliable service with reduced loads also.
0 kommentar(er)
